Prediction of Jurgen Briand [898th] vs David Poljak [896th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W W L L L L
Form
L L W W W L W W W LHead To Head: Briand 1 - 0 Poljak
They have played 2 sets in total, with Briand winning 2 and Poljak winning 0. The last match between Briand and Poljak was at the M25 Prague, 11-05-2022, First, Clay with Jurgen Briand getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jurgen Briand | 1 |
| David Poljak | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-4 |
Stats 
Jurgen Briand
Player
David Poljak
43%
(
27 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
4
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
8
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:48:0 | Average Match Time | 1:48:0 |
| 43% (27/63) | 1st Serve % | 52% (38/73) |
| 89% (24/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (26/38) |
| 50% (18/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (16/35) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (3/3) |
| 42% (31/73) | Return Points Win % | 33% (21/63) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jurgen Briand vs David Poljak Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Briand 1 - 0 Poljak
Editorial Prediction:
Jurgen Briand Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Jurgen Briand
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
5
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
16 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Jurgen Briand
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Jurgen Briand
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
8
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Jurgen Briand
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jurgen Briand
Player
Daniil Glinka
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jurgen Briand
Player
Maik Steiner
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Jurgen Briand
59%
(
79 of
134)
1st Serve %
49%
(
52 of
107)
8
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
40 of
52)
51%
(
28 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
50 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
107)
124
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Antoine Ghibaudo
Player
Jurgen Briand
69%
(
65 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Boscardin Dias
Player
Jurgen Briand
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
68
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jurgen Briand
Player
Jakub Paul
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
David Poljak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
David Poljak
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
9
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Gabriele Volpi
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
8
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(2) 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Samuel Stolarik
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
45%
(
15 of
33)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
49
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
David Poljak
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
7
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
36 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
100
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Simon Reveniau
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-7(11) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Louis Larue
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Arthur Laborde
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
William Jucha
Player
David Poljak
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
18 of
24)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
16 of
18)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
46%
(
22 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
30
Total Points Won
42
|
3-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jonas Schaer
Player
David Poljak
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
2
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
6-7(3) 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (157/106) | Win/Loss | 55% (339/277) |
| 60% (359/239) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (772/660) |
| 55% (2985/2457) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7082/6591) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 590 | Aces Total | 2608 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 573 | Total Double Faults | 1604 |
| 1:6:45 | Average Match Time | 1:23:9 |
| 367.15 | Average Opponent Rank | 514.34 |
| 56% (6925/12286) | 1st Serve % | 60% (22053/36955) |
| 68% (4682/6925) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (15460/22053) |
| 49% (2631/5361) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (7229/14901) |
| 43% (570/1334) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1498/3447) |
| 42% (5095/12155) | Return Points Win % | 39% (14194/36182) |
| 61% (157/258) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (334/610) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 49% (35/71) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (98/191) |
| 41% (30/73) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (105/205) |
| 87% (167/145) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (336/280) |
| 13% (167/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (336/56) |
| 13% (96/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (280/57) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
